Amd Ryzen 5 3500u Vs Amd Ryzen 7 3700x Reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Comparison of the technical characteristics betwixt the processors, with the AMD Ryzen v 3500U on one side and the AMD Ryzen vii 3700X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the mainstream-class laptop sector, It has four cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a full of viii cores, xvi threads, its turbo frequency is set to iv.iv GHz. The post-obit table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM retentiveness chapters, the type of retentiveness accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench four and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links in a higher place.
This folio contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this folio.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen five 3500U | AMD Ryzen vii 3700X | ||||||
| Market (master) | Mainstream-class laptop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 scrap) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Zen two | ||||||
| Core name | Picasso | Matisse | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen five 3000 | Ryzen 7 3000 | ||||||
| Role number(south), S-Spec | YM3500C4T4MFG | 100-000000071, 100-100000071BOX | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2019 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Transistors | 4,940,000,000 | 19,200,000,000 | ||||||
| Cores | four | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.ane GHz | 3.6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | iii.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache retentivity | four MB | 32 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Retention types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max retentivity bandwidth | 35.76 GB/s | 47.68 GB/south | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 Westward | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | - | 600W ATX Ability Supply  | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega eight (Picasso) | None | ||||||
| GPU cores | viii | - | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | - | ||||||
| GPU base of operations clock | 300 MHz | - | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | - | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,229 GFLOPS | - | ||||||
| Socket | FP5 | AM4 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | - | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z unmarried thread | 366 | 508 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | i,991 | five,459 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 unmarried thread | 140 | 200 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 658 | 2,100 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 784 | 1,334 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3,451 | 13,795 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | ii,112 | 2,676 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 7,915 | 22,767 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single cadre | three,218 | 5,602 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | ix,297 | 34,342 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS operation | 117.iii GFLOPS | 546 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-cadre / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 620 pts / Westward | 528 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  | | ||||||
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above.
We can amend compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that nosotros have An ATX estimator case, a loftier end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We volition have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more than retention, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, nosotros cannot currently brandish a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time cost. This is why we adopt for the moment not to testify a cost. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest cost, every bit well every bit availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen vii 3700X has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this nosotros consider the results generated on benchmark software such every bit Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen seven 3700X | 508 5,459 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 366 one,991 |
In single core, the difference is 39%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 174%.
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above. These scores are just an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system data software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the bundle, the process. It can too gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the unmarried thread, likewise as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 200 2,100 |
| AMD Ryzen five 3500U | 140 658 |
In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the deviation in terms of gap is 219%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links to a higher place. These scores are but an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the operation of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has ii,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses precipitous and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen seven 3700X | 1,334 xiii,795 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 784 3,451 |
In single cadre, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 300%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links higher up. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you lot may become dissimilar results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such every bit a estimator, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately fifty-fifty more relevant. The test scene contains no less than ii,000 objects and more than than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & unmarried thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 2,676 22,767 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | ii,112 7,915 |
In single cadre, the departure is 27%. In multi-core, the departure in terms of gap is 188%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are simply an
average of the performances got with these processors, y'all may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating signal, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the college is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-flake | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen seven 3700X | 5,602 34,342 |
| AMD Ryzen v 3500U | 3,218 9,297 |
In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the departure in terms of gap is 269%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-chip | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen seven 3700X | 6,080 37,556 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 2,765 half dozen,011 |
In unmarried core, the difference is 120%. In multi-core, the deviation in terms of gap is 525%.
On Android 64-chip:
| Geekbench iv - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen vii 3700X | 4,879 16,739 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 3,112 seven,308 |
In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 129%.
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, yous may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, nosotros took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 7 3700X Intel equivalent
See as well:
AMD Ryzen 5 3500AMD Ryzen five 3500CAMD Ryzen v 3500X
AMD Ryzen 7 3700CAMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and brand a buy, this can result in this site earning a committee. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Acquaintance I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes chapter links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a committee at no actress price to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #advert.
Information:
We do not presume whatever responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your ain risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, delight refer to the technical page on the corresponding manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Source: https://gadgetversus.com/processor/amd-ryzen-5-3500u-vs-amd-ryzen-7-3700x/
0 Response to "Amd Ryzen 5 3500u Vs Amd Ryzen 7 3700x Reviews"
Post a Comment